Authors: Okhueleigbe Osemhantie Amos
- SSAR Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences (SSARJAHSS), ISSN: 3049-0340 (Online).
- PP. 387-397
- DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.24013613
ABSTRACT: This study investigated how social media discourses shape the framing and public understanding of domestic violence. Anchored on Reception Theory and the Mediated Public Sphere Theory, the study adopted a qualitative interpretive design, analyzing 113 Facebook comments on a widely circulated domestic violence post. Using a purposive sampling formula, 50 comments were selected based on relevance, clarity, and contextual depth, ensuring validity and reliability of the dataset. Findings reveal that Facebook users frame wife battering as both a social pathology and a moral failing, often oscillating between cultural justifications and calls for justice; interpretive journalism emerges as a powerful tool for amplifying these mediated voices, while the comments also uncover stark tensions between legal frameworks such as Nigeria’s VAPP Act and persistent societal practices that normalize violence. The study concluded that wife battering is a dehumanizing reality that enslaves both victims and perpetrators, reducing love to hostility. It recommends that interpretive journalists actively mine mediated discourses for deeper insights, that policy actors intensify community-based sensitization, and that legal frameworks be harmonized with public consciousness to close the gap between law and lived realities.
KEYWORDS: Facebook, Interpretive Journalism, Social Media, Wife battering
REFERENCES
1. Adekoya, H. O., & Olaseinde-Fayomi, O. B. (2020). A textual analysis of audience responses to social media framing of domestic violence against men. SAU Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 5(2), 213–220.
2. Andalibi, N., Haimson, O. L., De Choudhury, M., & Forte, A. (2018). Understanding social media disclosures of sexual abuse through the lenses of support-seeking and anonymity. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1–23.
3. Babatope, A. E., Ibirongbe, D. O., Adewumi, I. P., Olanipekun, D. O. A., Idowu, D., Damola, O., Oluwafunbi, A., Gbenga, O., Kayode, O., & Oluyemi, S. (2025). Spatial variation of intimate partner violence and its public health implication: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 25, 2744.
4. Costa, D., Scharpf, F., Weiss, A., Ayanian, A. H., & Bozorgmehr, K. (2024). Intimate partner violence during COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis according to methodological choices. BMC Public Health, 24, 313.
5. Gorissen, M., De Schrijver, L., Loeys, T., Van Ouytsel, J., Ponnet, K., & Walrave, M. (2021). Online disclosure of sexual victimization: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(4), 1149–1164.
6. Gueta, O. (2024). Platform moderation and disclosure outcomes: Comparative evidence. New Media & Society, 26(4), 1123–1142.
7. Henry, N. (2024). Image-based sexual abuse and platform responses: Patterns of harm and governance. Journal of Gender-Based Technology Studies, 6(1), 45–68.
8. Ipas (Evaluation Team). (2024). An evaluation of the implementation of the Violence Against Persons Prohibition Act/Law in Nigeria (Evaluation report). Ipas Nigeria Health Foundation.
9. Kelly, J., & Payton, E. (2018). A content analysis of local media framing of intimate partner violence. Violence and Gender, 6(1), 47–52.
10. Okhueleigbe, O. A. (2024). Nollywood select satirical films (2018-2022) and the challenge of interpretive journalism in Nigeria. A doctoral dissertation submitted to the University of Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria (Unpublished).
11. Oseni, T. I. A., Salam, T. O., Ilori, T., & Momoh, M. O. (2022). Prevalence and pattern of intimate partner violence among men and women in Edo State, Southern Nigeria. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine, 14(1), a3147.
12. Salgado, S., & Strömbäck, J. (2012). Interpretive journalism: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 144–161.
13. Sardinha, L., Maheu-Giroux, M., Stöckl, H., Meyer, S. R., García-Moreno, C., & WHO/Lancet IPV Prevalence Consortium. (2024). Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of intimate partner violence against adolescent girls. The Lancet Global Health, 12(5), e689–e702.
14. Soontjens, K. (2019). The rise of interpretive journalism: Belgian newspaper coverage, 1985–2014. Journalism Studies, 20(7), 952–971.
15. Stöckl, H., Maheu-Giroux, M., Meyer, S. R., García-Moreno, C., & WHO IPV Prevalence Team. (2022). Global, regional and national prevalence estimates of intimate partner violence against women (2018): Methodological and measurement notes. The Lancet, 399(10327), 123–139.
16. Stray, J. (2023). Algorithmic amplification and engagement incentives: How platforms reward emotional content. Policy & Internet, 15(4), 653–672.
17. Svith, F. T. (2024). Inferential causal explanatory journalism: A science-based bridge between outcome and cause in journalism. Journalism. Advance online publication.
18. Thomson, T. J. (2019). To see and be seen: The environments, interactions and identities behind news images. Rowman & Littlefield.
19. Usher, K., Durkin, J., Martin, S., Vanderslott, S., Vindrola-Padros, C., Usher, L., & Jackson, D. (2021). Public sentiment and discourse on domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: Analysis of social media posts. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(10), e29025.
20. Verkest, S. (2024). Negotiating interpretive power: Interpretive practices in journalist-scientist interactions. Journalism, 25(8), 1697–1716.
21. Westminster Foundation for Democracy. (2023). Report of the impact of the VAPP and related laws in 12 states (Impact assessment). WFD.
22. White, S. J. (2024). Mental-health sequelae and long-term effects of intimate partner violence: A recent review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(2), 123–135